Testing Seals in Virginia
VDOT Tests Show Standard Chip Seal and Microsurface Treatment Specs Hold Strong
The Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC) released a final report titled “Pavement Preservation Demonstration Projects for Chip Seal and Microsurfacing Treatments” based on research performed for the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). VDOT prepared the field trial to assess how surface treatments are specified across the Commonwealth and beyond. The results show that sometimes sticking with the tried-and-true pays off.
The initiative stemmed from VDOT’s collaboration with the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), as part of project 20-44(26), and it built on guidance from earlier NCHRP 14-37 work. By 2021, three new specs focused on chip seal, microsurfacing and fog seal were crafted. These updates combined Virginia’s current practices with newer national guidelines developed by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
VDOT hit the field in 2022 with two real-world test projects: a chip seal job in Prince George County, and a microsurfacing treatment—alongside a fog seal on the shoulders—in York County’s Hampton Roads district.
The report from Ilker Boz, Ph.D., P.E., the senior research scientist, and Harikrishanan Nair, Ph.D., P.E., the associate director for pavements, is summarized herein.
Two Treatments
For the chip seal trial, crews tackled a 3-mile stretch of Route 623. The section was divided into two parts: a 0.9-mile demo using the new specification, and a longer reference section done according to VDOT’s existing spec—a modified single-layer chip seal.
Meanwhile, on Route 132 in York County, the microsurfacing project took a similar approach. One direction of the road received the updated microsurfacing treatment, while the other direction received the standard treatment as a control. Both shoulders also received a fog seal treatment.
The roads selected for these trials represented typical traffic volumes for secondary and arterial roadways ranging from 450 to 750 vehicles per day in Prince George, and up to 10,000 vehicles per day in Hampton Roads.
A Preservation Primer: Which Pavement Facelift is Right for Your Situation?
While the average motorist wouldn’t notice the difference, there were some technical changes baked into the new specs. They leaned on several AASHTO standards, such as M 340 and R 102 for chip seals, and M 341 and R 103 for microsurfacing.
These specs updated material properties, application rates, design procedures, and even quality control benchmarks. The goal was to improve performance, increase longevity and reduce maintenance needs.
VDOT wanted to know if the new guidelines would deliver a smoother ride, better skid resistance, or more durable surfaces than their current practice.
Inside the Evaluation Process
Before construction began, crews documented the surface conditions using visual inspections and data-driven metrics. They measured everything from texture depth and rutting to overall ride quality.
Throughout construction, the team observed weather conditions, material application methods, and how closely crews followed both the old and new specs. After completion, both test sections were monitored for 13 months, using specialized tools, like VDOT’s pavement profiler and the SCRIM® machine, to measure macrotexture (mean profile depth), rut depth, friction and International Roughness Index (IRI).
Chip Seal Verdict: Room to Improve
The findings suggested the chip seal executed under the new specification didn’t perform any differently than the one done the old way. In fact, there were several challenges during construction of the demonstration section. Crews struggled to hit the target aggregate application rate. The spreading of the stone wasn’t as uniform as needed, which contributed to inconsistencies in surface texture and friction. There was also a notable difference in the structural approach—one section used a standard single-layer seal while the other employed a modified version.
Researchers concluded the performance differences were due more to these inconsistencies than the specs themselves. Boz and his team concluded that more field trials are needed, especially using the modified single-layer method under the new spec. Until then, VDOT’s current chip seal approach remains the standard.
Microsurfacing Verdict: Hold Steady
The microsurfacing side of the study delivered a similar outcome. Despite applying the newly developed spec on one side of Route 132 and the existing spec on the other, researchers didn’t find any notable differences in short-term performance.
Skid resistance, surface texture and ride quality were comparable between the two sections. While the fog seal added a protective layer to the shoulders, its role wasn’t central to the comparative analysis.
Given these results, the recommendation was straightforward: VDOT should continue using its current microsurfacing spec. There’s no performance-based reason to switch at this time.
The demonstration projects weren’t failures, but provided valuable insights on how specification changes affect field performance, and more importantly, what it takes to implement them effectively. Even the best-designed specs won’t yield great results without precise application and construction quality. This was especially evident in the chip seal section, where variable stone coverage “hurt” the final outcome.
The study underscored the importance of training, consistency and real-time quality control in ensuring that new specs don’t just look good on paper, but work on the pavement too.
VDOT’s Next Steps
Based on the findings, researchers are recommending the following:
- More field trials using the new chip seal spec with modified single-layer design. This will help determine whether the spec itself or the execution was the limiting factor.
- Stick with current microsurfacing specs for now.
- Continue collecting data to better understand long-term performance trends beyond the initial 13-month observation window.
In the meantime, VDOT remains committed to innovation, but with a healthy dose of caution. The agency’s goal isn’t just to change specs for the sake of change, but to make sure every adjustment truly adds value for Virginia’s road users. Behind every resurfaced road or preserved shoulder is a mix of engineering standards and budget constraints to fit real-world conditions. For VDOT, this study was about asking the hard questions and being open to the answers—even when those answers suggest sticking with what already works.
For more information, read the full report from Virginia Transportation Research Council here.
















